◆…◆

 

1. It is Japan that should present a list of vessels since the vessels in question are now in Japan's possession. It is in the spirit of expediting the proceeding of the committee meeting that we are going to present a list of Vessels one after another.

2. We do not consider that the presentation of "a complete list of vessels" falling under agenda item A would expedite the proceeding of the committee meeting. We must implement without delay the previous government instructions on the subject.

3. If the Japanese side continues to argue about nature of SCAPIN, etc., please evade discussion on nature or interpretation of documents concerned, but sound out what their real intention is in this connection, requesting them to present their view in writing (in the form of Memorandum and so on). (이하여백)

 

 

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OUR POSITION

 

Document N0.의정 제4,068호

Date: November 4, 1948

Re: Return of Korean Art objects

(Refer to MTB-031)

 

1. It is not our side but the Japanese side that must present the list of Korean art objects to be returned to our side, because they are now in Japan's possession. It is to expedite the proceeding of the talks that we presented the list containing about 1,000 items.

2. An important thing at this stage of the talks is for us to confirm, at the earliest possible date, whether the Japanese side is really determined to return Korean art objects. We cannot but entertain doubt in this regard in view of the recent proceeding of the Committee on Other Claims (regarding art objects) and also in view of remarks made by responsible officials at the Diet or to the press.

3. As for the list of art objects which are mutually satisfactory, joint investigation can be made by the Working Party consisting of representatives of both sides, only if the Japanese side agrees to return them, and only if both sides agree on general principles on a way of returning them. (이하여백)