한국 선박의 반환문제
November 3, 1958
Re: Return of Korean Vessels
(Refer to MTB-038)
1. It is Japan that should present a list of vessels since the vessels in question are now in Japan's possession. It is in the spirit of expediting the proceeding of the committee meeting that we are going to present a list of vessels one after another.
2. We do not consider that the presentation of "a complete list of vessels" falling under agenda item A would expedite the proceeding of the committee meeting. We must implement without delay the previous government instructions on the subject.
3. If the Japanese side continues to argue about nature of SCAPIN, etc., please evade discussion on nature or interpretation of documents concerned, but sound out what their real intention is in this connection, requesting them to present their view in writing (in the form of Memorandum and so on).
(Refer to MTB-038)
1. It is Japan that should present a list of vessels since the vessels in question are now in Japan's possession. It is in the spirit of expediting the proceeding of the committee meeting that we are going to present a list of vessels one after another.
2. We do not consider that the presentation of "a complete list of vessels" falling under agenda item A would expedite the proceeding of the committee meeting. We must implement without delay the previous government instructions on the subject.
3. If the Japanese side continues to argue about nature of SCAPIN, etc., please evade discussion on nature or interpretation of documents concerned, but sound out what their real intention is in this connection, requesting them to present their view in writing (in the form of Memorandum and so on).
색인어
- 지명
- Japan
- 기타
- SCAPIN
