송환문제에 관한 한국 측 전략 지시
번호 : FTB-501
일시 : DEC 11, 1959
TO : AMB YIU AND DELEGATION
REFER TO WOIMUBU'S "STUDY PAPER ON CERTAIN ASPECT OF ICJ PROCEDURE ETC " WHICH IS BEING SENT BY SEPARATE CABLE.
DELEGATION IS INSTRUCTED TO IMMEDIATELY TAKE THE FOLLOWING COURSE OF ACTION SUGGESTING THE POSSIBLE ICJ PROCEDINGS TO SETTLE ULTIMATELY THE DEPORTATION ISSUE.
1. FIRST OF ALL, DELEGATION MUST BEAR IN MIND THAT GOVERNMENT ADOPTS THIS STRATEGY TO DRIVE JAPANESE INTO AN EMBARRANSSING POSITION AND ALSO PUT THEM IN BAD SHAPE IN THE EYES OF FREE WORLD PUBLIC OPINION.
2. AT THE MEETING WHEN DELEGATION MAKES REPRESENTATION BY FTB-500, REQUEST IMMEDIATE DISCUSSION OF THE PROBLEM OF THOSE WHO NEITHER WISH TO REPATRIATE TO ROK NOR WISH TO REMAIN IN JAPAN, POINTING OUT ILIEGALITY THAT JAPAN IS ABOUT TO UNILATERALLY DISPOSE OF IT. REQUEST IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE DEPORTATION SCHEME IF JAPAN IS SINCERE TO TAKE UP PROBLEM FOR SETTLEMENT.
3. IF THE JAPANESE DO NOT COMPLY WITH OUR REQUEST, POINT OUT CATEGORICALLY HOW JAPANESE GOVERNMENT HAD ORIGINATED DEPORTATION SCHEME IN FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF AGREED MINUTES SIGNED ON DECEMBER 31, 1957. STATE HOW EARNESTLY MW PATIENTLY KOREAN GOVERNMENT STRIVED TO SOLVE THIS ISSUE THROUGH DIPLOMATIC NEGOTIATION AND HOW SUCH EFFORTS FAILED DUE TO JAPANESE OBSTAINCY IN REFUSING TO SOLVE IT BY DIPLOMATIC TALKS, DECLARE THAT AS JAPANESE GOVERNMENT IS STILL ATTEMPTING TO PUSH THROUGH ITS SCHEME DESPITE THESE EFFORTS ON PART OF KOREAN GOVERNMENT, KOREAN GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO DECIDE TO BRING THIS ISSUE BEFORE ICJ , SPECIFICALLY OVER BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATION ON JAPANESE PART IN REGARD TO SAID AGREED MINUTES,. IN MAKING THIS STATEMENT, FORMALLY REQUEST JAPANESE AGREEMENT WITH US TO SEEK JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF THE ISSUE. THE JAPANESE SIDE MAY SAT WE SHOULD FIRST FILE "APPLICATION" TO ICJ AFTER NECESSARY PROCEDURES. THEN, POINT OUT SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD MEET ANY WAY JAPANESE AGREEMENT, AND THAT IS WHY WE ARE. SOUNDING OUT JAPANESE INTENTIONS TO SAVE TIME.
4. SHOULD JAPANESE SIDE REFUSE ON THE SPOT TO SEEK JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT, DENOUNCE HOW UNFAIR AND UNJUST JAPANESE SIDE IS TO HAVE REFUSED A PROPOSAL FOR JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT EVEN GOING TO ICJ. STATE THAT KOREAN GOVERNMENT IS GREATLY DISPPOINTED TO SEE JAPANESE DISINCLINATION TOWARD JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT, AND THAT WHOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY CONSEQUENCES ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH DEPORTATION SCHEME NOW ACCORDINGLY RESTS SQUARELY WITH JAPANESE GOVERNMENT. PUT JAPANESE REFUSAL ON RECORD.
5. SHOULD JAPANESE SAY THAT THEY WOULD REPLY TO OUR PROPOSAL LATER ON, PRESS FOR A REPLY AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE MOMENT, POINTING OUT URGENCY OF TIME. WE MUST NOT BE DRAGGED INTO JAPANESE DELAYING TACTICS.
6. SHOULD JAPANESE SIDE SHOW NO OBJECTION TO IDEA OF REFERRING DEPORTATION CASE TO ICJ, ASK THEM AT ONCE THAT THEY SUSPEND IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPORTATION SCHEME UNTIL AT LEAST COURT JUDGMENT OR ANY RELEVANT COURT ACTION AS THERE IS NOT ENOUGH TIME LEFT TO HAVE COURT OPENED AND FOR ROK TO ASK FOR AN INTERIM MEASURE UNDER STATUTE ARTICLE 41 TO PRESERVE ITS RIGHTS, POINT OUT IT IS NATURAL AND PROPER FOR JAPAN TO DO SO, INASMUCH AS JAPAN AGREES TO SEEK JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT. POINT OUT JAPANESE GOVERNMENT IS ACCORDINGLY OBLIGED TO REFRAIN FROM TAKING ANY UNILATERAL MEASURE.
7. SHOULD JAPAN REFUSE TO GO ALONG WITH SUSPENSION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPORTATION SCHEME, POINT OUT CATEGORICALLY THERE IS NO USE OF REFERRING DEPORTATION CASE TO ICJ, FOR NOBODY IS GOING TO COURT OVER A FAIT ACCOMPLI. POINT OUT THAT RELUCTANCE ON JAPANESE PART TO SUSPEND SHOWS CLEARLY THAT IT HAS NO REAL INTENTION TO SEEK JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT.
REPORT AFTER ACTION
REFER TO WOIMUBU'S "STUDY PAPER ON CERTAIN ASPECT OF ICJ PROCEDURE ETC " WHICH IS BEING SENT BY SEPARATE CABLE.
DELEGATION IS INSTRUCTED TO IMMEDIATELY TAKE THE FOLLOWING COURSE OF ACTION SUGGESTING THE POSSIBLE ICJ PROCEDINGS TO SETTLE ULTIMATELY THE DEPORTATION ISSUE.
1. FIRST OF ALL, DELEGATION MUST BEAR IN MIND THAT GOVERNMENT ADOPTS THIS STRATEGY TO DRIVE JAPANESE INTO AN EMBARRANSSING POSITION AND ALSO PUT THEM IN BAD SHAPE IN THE EYES OF FREE WORLD PUBLIC OPINION.
2. AT THE MEETING WHEN DELEGATION MAKES REPRESENTATION BY FTB-500, REQUEST IMMEDIATE DISCUSSION OF THE PROBLEM OF THOSE WHO NEITHER WISH TO REPATRIATE TO ROK NOR WISH TO REMAIN IN JAPAN, POINTING OUT ILIEGALITY THAT JAPAN IS ABOUT TO UNILATERALLY DISPOSE OF IT. REQUEST IMMEDIATE SUSPENSION OF THE DEPORTATION SCHEME IF JAPAN IS SINCERE TO TAKE UP PROBLEM FOR SETTLEMENT.
3. IF THE JAPANESE DO NOT COMPLY WITH OUR REQUEST, POINT OUT CATEGORICALLY HOW JAPANESE GOVERNMENT HAD ORIGINATED DEPORTATION SCHEME IN FLAGRANT VIOLATION OF AGREED MINUTES SIGNED ON DECEMBER 31, 1957. STATE HOW EARNESTLY MW PATIENTLY KOREAN GOVERNMENT STRIVED TO SOLVE THIS ISSUE THROUGH DIPLOMATIC NEGOTIATION AND HOW SUCH EFFORTS FAILED DUE TO JAPANESE OBSTAINCY IN REFUSING TO SOLVE IT BY DIPLOMATIC TALKS, DECLARE THAT AS JAPANESE GOVERNMENT IS STILL ATTEMPTING TO PUSH THROUGH ITS SCHEME DESPITE THESE EFFORTS ON PART OF KOREAN GOVERNMENT, KOREAN GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO DECIDE TO BRING THIS ISSUE BEFORE ICJ , SPECIFICALLY OVER BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATION ON JAPANESE PART IN REGARD TO SAID AGREED MINUTES,. IN MAKING THIS STATEMENT, FORMALLY REQUEST JAPANESE AGREEMENT WITH US TO SEEK JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT OF THE ISSUE. THE JAPANESE SIDE MAY SAT WE SHOULD FIRST FILE "APPLICATION" TO ICJ AFTER NECESSARY PROCEDURES. THEN, POINT OUT SUCH APPLICATION SHOULD MEET ANY WAY JAPANESE AGREEMENT, AND THAT IS WHY WE ARE. SOUNDING OUT JAPANESE INTENTIONS TO SAVE TIME.
4. SHOULD JAPANESE SIDE REFUSE ON THE SPOT TO SEEK JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT, DENOUNCE HOW UNFAIR AND UNJUST JAPANESE SIDE IS TO HAVE REFUSED A PROPOSAL FOR JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT EVEN GOING TO ICJ. STATE THAT KOREAN GOVERNMENT IS GREATLY DISPPOINTED TO SEE JAPANESE DISINCLINATION TOWARD JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT, AND THAT WHOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY CONSEQUENCES ARISING IN CONNECTION WITH DEPORTATION SCHEME NOW ACCORDINGLY RESTS SQUARELY WITH JAPANESE GOVERNMENT. PUT JAPANESE REFUSAL ON RECORD.
5. SHOULD JAPANESE SAY THAT THEY WOULD REPLY TO OUR PROPOSAL LATER ON, PRESS FOR A REPLY AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE MOMENT, POINTING OUT URGENCY OF TIME. WE MUST NOT BE DRAGGED INTO JAPANESE DELAYING TACTICS.
6. SHOULD JAPANESE SIDE SHOW NO OBJECTION TO IDEA OF REFERRING DEPORTATION CASE TO ICJ, ASK THEM AT ONCE THAT THEY SUSPEND IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPORTATION SCHEME UNTIL AT LEAST COURT JUDGMENT OR ANY RELEVANT COURT ACTION AS THERE IS NOT ENOUGH TIME LEFT TO HAVE COURT OPENED AND FOR ROK TO ASK FOR AN INTERIM MEASURE UNDER STATUTE ARTICLE 41 TO PRESERVE ITS RIGHTS, POINT OUT IT IS NATURAL AND PROPER FOR JAPAN TO DO SO, INASMUCH AS JAPAN AGREES TO SEEK JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT. POINT OUT JAPANESE GOVERNMENT IS ACCORDINGLY OBLIGED TO REFRAIN FROM TAKING ANY UNILATERAL MEASURE.
7. SHOULD JAPAN REFUSE TO GO ALONG WITH SUSPENSION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF DEPORTATION SCHEME, POINT OUT CATEGORICALLY THERE IS NO USE OF REFERRING DEPORTATION CASE TO ICJ, FOR NOBODY IS GOING TO COURT OVER A FAIT ACCOMPLI. POINT OUT THAT RELUCTANCE ON JAPANESE PART TO SUSPEND SHOWS CLEARLY THAT IT HAS NO REAL INTENTION TO SEEK JUDICIAL SETTLEMENT.
REPORT AFTER ACTION
FOREIGN MINISTER
색인어
- 지명
- ROK, JAPAN, JAPAN, JAPAN, ROK, JAPAN, JAPAN, JAPAN
- 관서
- JAPANESE GOVERNMENT, KOREAN GOVERNMENT, JAPANESE GOVERNMENT, JAPANESE GOVERNMENT
- 단체
- ICJ, ICJ, ICJ, ICJ
- 문서
- STUDY PAPER ON CERTAIN ASPECT OF ICJ PROCEDURE ETC
- 기타
- THE DEPORTATION ISSUE
