주메뉴 바로가기내용 바로가기하단 바로가기
상세검색
  • 디렉토리 검색
  • 작성·발신·수신일
    ~
한일회담외교문서

제2차 어업 및 평화선위원회 회의 요록

  • 날짜
    1958년 10월 13일
  • 문서종류
    회의록
  • 형태사항
    영어 
Tokyo, October 13, 1958
GIST OF TALKS
SECOND SESSION
COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES AND "PEACE LINE"
 
1. Time and Place :
3 p.m. - 3:50 pm, October 10, 1958,
at Room 411, Ministry of Foreign of Affairs,
Japanese Government
 
2. Conferees:
Korean sides:
Mr. CHANG, Kyung Keun
Mr. CHOI, Kyu Hah
Mr. CHEE, Chul Keun
Mr. CHIN, Pil Shik
Mr. MOON, Chul Soon
Mr. CHIN, Young Dal
Mr. LEE, Won Ho
Japanese sides:
Mr. Wataru OKUMA
Mr. Kenjio MISHIMURA
Mr. Masamich NAKAMURA
Mr. TACRIKAWA
Mr. Kiyoshi SUGANUMA
Mr. Minse TSUCHIYA
Mr. Kenno KAWAKAMI
Mr. Shiro KOYAMA
 
3. Gist of Talks:
(At the beginning of the second meeting of Committee, chief member of the Japan delegation Mr. OKUMA expressed the view of the Japanese Government Concerning fishery problem as follows.)
"As the opening speech delivered by Korean delegate at the first meeting of this Committee, which was held the either day, tousned on the view of the Korean side concerning fishery problem, today, I would like to express the view of the Japanese side thereto.
In order to maintain the optima sustained productivity of fisheries resources in the high seas in keeping with the recent development of fishing technique, there growing are the practices that the countries ◆…◆ are taking conservation measures through mutual cooperation. It goes without saying that this is the most effective method is making possible the ◆…◆ fish catch throughout a long period of time far the ◆…◆ of human being. The freedom of high seas is the freedom accompanied by the obligation to preserve such resources and this freedom does not allow unrestricted and irresponsible fish catch.
Japan, for its part, holds a greater concern toward the preservation of fisheries resources as the degree of her dependence upon the fishing industry is greater.
Under these circumstances, Japan has so far been contributing to the preservation of the resources in cooperation with the countries concerned either by nowlyconcluding agreements regarding the presentation of fisheries resources in the high seas or by seceding to existing fisheries agreement.
As Mr.Chang chief member of the Korean delegation, maintained in his opening speech, the Japanese side, too, holds the view that we would set up a basis for permanent peace and friendship between the two countries by preventing the ◆…◆ or exhausting of steaks of fishes in the high seas and also the cause of disputes.
However, it thinks that, in case of taking such conservation measures or regulations, no international law or customs recognize a state to exercise unilaterally an exclusive jurisdiction over certain area of the high seas.
What is more, such an exercise of exclusive ju◆◆◆◆◆◆tion will ◆◆◆ be appropriate for the effective conservation and utility of the resources, as well.
As to regulations and conservation measures, it is necessary for the countries concerned to case them on scientifie findings, and to mutually cooperate on equal footing. This will be in accord with the principles of international law and furthermore may well result in achieving a real objective thereof.
The Japanese side entertains a hope that we will be able to work out just and proper arrangement that can ◆…◆ the both sides, through a carefull reexamination of the experience, on the said basis, which we have obtained during the past three conferences, for preserving the fisheries resources over which Japan and Korea have a common concern and also to secure the maximum sustained productivity thereof."
 
Mr. Chang:
Though there were points which are not in accord with our views in what you have stated now, I would like to study on it. However, I think it might be condusive to smooth proceeding of our meetings at this Committee if the Japanese side tell the Korean side are practical and concrete opinion in this regard rather than such a theoretical principle.
Mr. Okuma:
As the Korean side wanted to know the concrete view of time Japanese side, I will present the essentials or Japan-Korea Fisheries Agreement here now as follows:
1. In view of the fact that an exclusive jurisdiction by one country within a specifies area on the high seas is not recognized under international law and customs, Japan and Korea will make arrangement for the preservation and exploitation, through mutual collaboration, necessary for the maintenance of the maximum sustained productivity of the acquatie resources in the high seas where the two countries have common interest.
2. The two countries will establish and maintain the Japan-Korea Joint Fisheries Committee which will consist at the members appointed by each Government is equal number. The Commission shall recommend necessary measures for the preservation and exploitation of fisheries resources. The said measures shall be based as scientifie findings and applied to the two countries on equal footing.
3. Until such time as the said Commission make its recommendations on necessary arrangements, the two countries will set up the "abstention areas" in respect of fishing with trawls and dragnets.
4. Is the arrangements for the prevention of undesirable competition and disputes in the waters where the fishing vessels of the two countries are interaingled in engaging in fishing by trolling apparatus and on the illuminating power of fish-collecting light.
5. The two countries shall enact and enforce necessary laws and regulations for the matters referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4, with regard to its nationals and fishing vessels, with appropriate penalties against violution thereof."
Mr. Chang:
ls the "essentials of Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement" the formal proposal of the Japanese side?
Mr. Okuma:
Yes, that is the formal proposal of the Japanese side.
Mr. Chang:
I will reserve Korean view on the Japanese proposal now. However, I would likes to any a word in this connection. I received from the "essentials of Korea-Japan Fisheries Agreement" an impression that the Japanese side denies to recognize Korea's Peace Line. That is quite contrary to my expectation.
Mr. Okuma:
(After silence for several minutes ) Have you anything to say in this regard?
Mr. Chang:
Not now.
Mr. Okuma:
Then, I would like to suggest next Wednesday (October 15) for our next meeting.
Mr. Chang:
I would like to have enough time to study the Japanese proposal. I would therefore rather like to propose next Friday (October 17).
Mr. Okuma:
No objection.
Mr. Chang:
What time will be convenient to you?
Mr. Okuma:
3 p.m.
Mr. Chang:
That will do. And any particular idea at press release?
Mr. Okuma:
Let us leave the matter to Mr. Suganuma and Mr. Chin.
Mr. Chang:
No objection.
(Text of joint press release:
The Japanese side stated its general opinion on fisheries and the View of the Korean side will be presented at the next meeting in this record.)
 
-The end-
오류접수

본 사이트 자료 중 잘못된 정보를 발견하였거나 사용 중 불편한 사항이 있을 경우 알려주세요. 처리 현황은 오류게시판에서 확인하실 수 있습니다. 전화번호, 이메일 등 개인정보는 삭제하오니 유념하시기 바랍니다.

제2차 어업 및 평화선위원회 회의 요록 자료번호 : kj.d_0005_0120_0030